canon 135mm f2 astrophotography

KevinS, in my experience stopping down dramatically improves image quality in terms of chromatic aberration, coma and astigmatism. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. With an effective focal length of roughly 216mm when coupled with a Canon crop sensor body, the field of view is nearly identical to the one youd find on a full-frame camera with a 200mm telephoto lens. Literally it means "blur" so you could just as well use the dictionary definition below the top match from Google search: Bokeh - the visual quality of the out-of-focus areas of a photographic image, especially as rendered by a particular lens. Best lens for portraiture I've ever tried. Shoot shiny metal at a wide aperture and you'll see some very extreme purple fringing. What next, an article extolling the virtues of 43mm, or 70mm? Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. The Canon 135mm f/2 is no less impressive on a full-frame camera. Together they still weight less than any modern 135mm :>. I have no experience with that lens, Jerry Lodriguss however published a review of that lens on his websitehttp://www.astropix.NIKON_180MM.HTM. I liked the extra versatility of the zoom and the ability to shoot at 200mm. I have found myself shooting wide open almost all the time. Sme of the wide field are. I read and bought it. While there are certainly pricey 135mm F2 lenses out there (such as the aforementioned Sigma 135mm F1.8 Art, or the Carl Zeiss 135mm) there are a couple that give you extreme value for the money. (And cost less too). Also, the lens can only be operated when aperture is set to 22, wondering how I could use F2. I am no stranger to the full manual control of this lens, for both aperture and focus. Pocketable. This has several advantages from less demanding tracking accuracy, to being able to use a lower ISO setting. Lots of wet blankets around here. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. Theres no image stabilization on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 either, but thats a non-issue for amateur astrophotographers. If 135mm f2 works for you, then fine. Well saturated but neutral. The finish and texture of the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is a step up from the 14mm F/2.8 I ordered a few years ago. Interesting. On FF I use this lens for both tight portraits and landscape shots. Perhaps this impression of unreal sharpness is strengthened by the contrast to the extremely creamy bokeh you typically get in the same photo. I'm thinking a modern (but expensive) Nikon 200mm f/2.0, 300mm f/4 or f/2.8 or a Borg telephoto/telescope would all be very good. Whatever lens you pick in the end, you will make a great purchase. I really wanted to use, and like, a 135mm f2 lens so I bought the Canon version. As it is it is earns a 9. The first telephoto lens of choice, especially recommended for beginners, is the 135mm F2.5 SMC Pentax. The EOS R6 II arrives in one of the most competitive parts of the market, facing off against some very capable competition. Photography is art and technology, the latter serving the first.Photography is not something arty with a lot of gadgetry. Extrapolating from this, minimum recommended guidescope power is 120x for the 300mm telephoto, 80x for the 200mm, and 55x for the 135mm. Cost. Just like the above samples, most are just bad. Samyang 85mm f1.83. This lens is simply lighter, cheaper & faster (f/2.0 vs f/2.8). When stopped down to 37mm, at F5.4, it also produces perfect, small and round star images across the entire field. Lior, I have done a lot of reading on modern zoom lenses. Tack sharp at f/2. Defocus control enables the photographer to use an aperture of f/4 for the subject and to adjust the amount of background blur or the amount of foreground blur. In general, prime telephotos should outperform zooms. The lens hood is not petal-shaped, which is great news for those using this lens for astrophotography. Samyang 135 f/2 ED astrophotography modifications - astrojolo As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. Large focus ring. Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. ", I'd no problem with that. Bottom line, this is just an outstanding lens by any measure, one that makes clear why you'd want to pay the freight for expensive prime glass. if you really want to get the best gym photos that can be taken, use it and enjoy what you will see. Many students just wanted to take better snapshots of family, vacation, pets, etc. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. It is a parade of photos that should have been galled out after a boring Sunday afternoon shoot of "Think I'll bring along a camera when I walk the dog", There are so many things wrong in this 'review' -- most of all the idea that 'you' should get this lens and somehow it magically makes the duck or the cat stuck right in the center of picture a great photo! All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. I've owned a few L lenses and while their USM motors have always been quick to snap in focus, this 135mm is on a different level. Never before (nor after) have I seen a lens with this level of sharpness wide open. Focal length: 135mm Maximum aperture: f/2.0 Lens construction: 10 elements in 8 groups Angle of view: 18 degrees Closest focusing distance: 3 feet Focus adjustment: Rear focusing system with USM Mount: Canon Filter size: 72mm Dimensions: 3.2 inches in diameter and 4.4 inches long Weight: 1.7 pounds Warranty: 1 year See more Better than nothing I guess, would depend on how much it raises the price. If so, which one? Beautiful portrait lens. enlarge. My goal for this article was to show some great example photos and share some ideas for projects this lens is a good fit for. FULL FRAME TELEPHOTO 135mm F2.0 In this review, however, I am using the lens on a crop sensor (APS-C) Canon EOS 60Da, which puts the field of view at 12.4 degrees. Now I wonder why people are never happy even on 3rd day of a new year :) Come on guys just think "Micael Widell" was working over holiday period to publish this free article ;). The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. It seems lazy to me. I bought my lens in mint condition for $350 from Japan, but I see that some retailers are asking significantly more. There is no doubt that the 135L deserves it excellent reputation for image quality. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. There is no agreement about what Bokeh means. With a good smartphone, some creative legwork, and the photos scaled down as they are in this article you can make photos that at least just as good. CANON LENS FOR ASTROPHOTOGRAPHY. Thanks, (37% is difference, so you get little more, about 15.5Mpix) ". You can use Stellarium to preview the image scale with the 135mm lens and your DSLR. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. The image below was captured using a DSLR and 135mm lens on the Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer mount. The 50mm f/1.4 and f/1.2 is another story.While the 135mm f/2, in general, is a good lens, there are lots of lenses other than the 135 f/2 that will produce a very smoothly blurred background, including zoom lenses.It sounds like Micael is new to photography.Just my impression from this article. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. I have been following your work both on YT and here from Japan for a while. I know taste is subjective, but it seems to me that some people have become obsessed with blur and bokeh. Micael Widell is a photography enthusiast based in Stockholm, Sweden. Exposure uniformity (vignetting) is also really excellent, reaching a maximum of 1/4 EV (on a camera with an APS-C size sensor) at f/2, and dropping to well under 1/10 EV at f/2.8 and above. f/2, fast-accurate-silent focus, (relatively) small & light, super sharp!! Seems like a great lens. And they like circles (no ellipses or polygons) and smooth colour (no hard edges, no onion rings). f/2! D8XX cameras, subject isolation and quality of bokeh.Zoom lenses can not hold a candle to such primes. You got a criticism fine say it politely, and too the point. There is some controversy about the use of UV filters, but I found that a good UV filter significantly improves contrast, sharpens small star images, and reduces chromatic aberration. And as this article clearly shows, no amount of blurr will make a poorly composed photo good. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. Why you should own a 135mm F2 lens - DPReview Round one of polls are now open, pick your winners and share your voice. When attached to a DSLR camera with a full frame sensor, the lens offers a massive 15.5 x 10.6 field of view, or 18.8 across the diagonal. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. I've recently started using 135 and 200mm lenses from the 1970s with my mono CCD and they've proven very useful for imaging large emission nebulae. The Olympus Zuiko 180/2.8 and 100/2.8 impressed me in the 1980s, but in the digital era they are not so sharp. I have used the canon 70-200 f2.8L ii and also the 100-400 f4.5/5.6 L with excellent results. Last time I used a 135mm f2 was decades ago on a Canon F1. A series of such images can be digitally stacked to produce excellent results. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. Oh yes, and it leads to lusting after other primes! I rarely shoot static landscapes or posed, composed images. This is an amazing lens.Very sharp wide open and no improvement when stopped own. A tiny bit of fringing, but that would only be noticed by pixel-peepers. The California Nebula. Which is the better buy? I got many great shots from this lens but also missed ton of shots due manual focus only. But ppl should know there is much better advice in the forums. An update to the Mini 11, the new camera adds parallax correction capabilities, automatic flash control and a multi-function twist lens. In excellent condition, this lens retails for around $200. Youll never have to worry about losing your position just by touching the lens, but you can always tape the position down to be sure. The article was based on the numerous lenses with which I have personal experience - that is naturally limited. Its nice to have the F/2. See the full-size version on Astrobin. Got it! Don't know what the young man uses as his camera, and if he has tried to keep the noise under control, or even tried to focus on the eyes of the mallard, or the cat (their eyes are not truly in focus). For posed portraiture, it's a very nice budget option.FWIW, I'm a corporate portrait and event pro. For me, that's enough. Still - a great portrait lens when used at f/2.8 or f/4, with a creamy bokeh indeed. I own Samyang 135 f2 for Nikon Mount and indeed it is incredible value lens. I got this lens because of portraiture. This way the focus will favor the red light which is more objectionable within a star image than a bit of blue. Light weight and robust. Geometric distortion is lower than one would expect, at 0.15% pincushion maximum, with an average of 0.07%. Simple as that! Add To Cart. CAs: a little in the OOF area - not disturbing anyway. Bond, I expect you to buy! Still, what a time to be an enthusiast/photog, so many nice options. in the rain. But she might as well be in front of a green screen. Any experience with this camera and would this lens be a good fit? Over the last ten to fifteen years excellent apochromatic telescopes have become available for visual use and photography. $218.00 for 7 days. The 135mm f2.8 in particular can take amazing photos of the brighter deep sky objects with about 1 second time . This image of NGC 7000 was done at F/4 at iso 800 with a Canon 20D mod. In the past, Ive covered a number of different lenses, from the Sigma 24mm F/1.4 to the Canon EF 300mm F/4L. The 70-200L being a much more useful lens. Astrophotography is one of the ultimate tests of lens quality, as long exposure photography of deep-sky objects in space can highlight issues that are hidden during daytime photography. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. Online since 2011, AstroBin is the #1 complete solution for image hosting of astrophotographs. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. And you can even crop a 135 efl with today's sensors should you actually need it. The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) (purchased for $845), reviewed November 16th, 2005 With the 135 I imagine I'd have to get up on the roof. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. One way to combat potential soft images and chasing perfect focus all night is to stop the lens down to F/2.8 or even F/4. You will get perfectly round star images if you use an aperture stop in front of the lens made of a series of filter thread step-down rings. I have done a review comparing the sharpness and quality of bokeh to the Canon 70-200 2.8. My Nikon focus and aperture rings are a thing of highly finessed engineering beauty! Since Eric was so generous to share his images with me, I had to include his photo of the Rho Ophiuchi cloud complex as well. Also, as creative as the wide-field 135mm focal length is, its not practical for smaller DSOs and most galaxies. The F/2.0 maximum aperture of the Rokinon 135mm lens offers a chance to collect a serious amount of signal in a single shot. I also find the other photos not very good. I should mention that I have only tested this full-frame lens using my astrophotography DSLRs, all of which are crop-sensor camera bodies. Unfortunately I haven't more the Canon lens. http://johncarnessali.com/camera-lens-tests/5109, After reading too many long, and arduous threads pertaining to the new Zeiss 135, I felt compelled to share my perspective on the wonderful Canon 135.

Simply Shade Solar Panel Replacement, Role Of Teacher In Traditional Classroom, Jackultramotive R32 Specs, Exit, Pursued By A Bear Monologue, Mayfair High School Sports, Articles C